Not His Style: Kurt Angle Reveals An Attitude Era Stable That Didn’t Work For Him

Not a fan. Factions have been a thing in wrestling for decades and the concept still makes sense to this day. Putting a bunch of wrestlers together for a common purpose can kill a few birds with one stone, as you are able to see what happens when they all come together. While there have been some incredible success stories, there have also been some that did not work out so well. A WWE legend is explaining why one of the stables from his time didn’t work.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: WATCH: Ronda Rousey Makes Ring Of Honor In-Ring Debut, Teases Huge Showdown

During a recent edition of the Kurt Angle Show, WWE Hall Of Famer Kurt Angle was asked about the Right To Censor. Angle said he did not think the concept worked, as it looked like the team was “like a bunch of office guys trying to wrestle”. Angle said that he didn’t like the idea but did not insult any of the wrestlers involved. The Right To Censor was a parody of the Parents Television Council, a group that criticized WWE, and featured Steven Richards, Val Venis, the Goodfather and Ivory.

The Right To Censor was an interesting concept. Check out some of their time in WWE:

Opinion: I can see the problem here, as the team was designed to be a parody and only had the longest shelf life. That was pretty clear when they were featured, as they were mainly there to be annoying and get beaten up. The idea did work well enough for the short term, but I can also see Angle’s point in that they were hard to take seriously in any way.

What did you think of the team? Is Angle being too harsh? Let us know in the comments below.

Please share this story on Facebook! And follow the Wrestling Rumors’ Twitter account for up to the minute news and more! Help us spread the word!

You can find more from Thomas Hall at kbwrestlingreviews.com, or check out his- Amazon author page with 30 wrestling books.

Get the LATEST RUMORS! Click to sign up for the exclusive Wrestling Rumors daily newsletter.