Hindsight Is 20/20? WWE Has Interesting Take On Controversial Decision Earlier This Year

That’s a choice. WWE is coming off of Summerslam, meaning we are a few months removed from this year’s WrestleMania. That gives WWE some time to look back on what they did at the biggest event of the year and see where things have gone since then. What might not have made the most sense back then could look better now, and that is how WWE sees things.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Go For It? WWE Attempting To Catch AEW Dynamite In Demographic, How It Could Change NXT

The main event of this year’s WrestleMania XXXIX saw Roman Reigns defeat Cody Rhodes to retain the WWE Universal Title. The match was set up when Rhodes won the men’s Royal Rumble to earn the shot. Reigns has gone on to retain the title since. According to the Wrestling Observer Newsletter, WWE sees the company’s continued growth since WrestleMania as proof that they made the right decision to not have Rhodes win the title. There is no word on when Reigns is expected to lose the title.

They did some good stuff. Check out the match and what the two have been doing since:

Opinion: This is one way of looking at things and it does make some sense, but at the same time, there does come a point when a change is going to need to be made. Reigns has almost reached three years as champion and that is reaching a point where WWE is going to have to change something. I’m not sure if it needed to be Rhodes, but it is going to have to be someone at some point before people are over Reigns.

What do you think of WWE’s stance? When should Reigns lose the title? Let us know in the comments below.

Please share this story on Facebook! And follow the Wrestling Rumors’ Twitter account for up to the minute news and more! Help us spread the word!

You can find more from Thomas Hall at kbwrestlingreviews.com, or check out his- Amazon author page with 30 wrestling books.

Get the LATEST RUMORS! Click to sign up for the exclusive Wrestling Rumors daily newsletter.